Mintable CEO and founder, Zach Burks, has voiced concerns over the United Kingdom government’s approach to regulating nonfungible tokens (NFTs), emphasizing that it may not align with the evolving nature of this emerging technology.
In a recent interview, Burks expressed his belief that a recent report from a U.K. parliamentary committee exaggerates the role of NFTs in copyright infringement. He believes it fails to acknowledge the broader utility of NFTs beyond being mere digital images with volatile values.
“NFTs are in a transition phase where they’re moving away from the speculative boom of PFPs, and now it’s going into utilities of brands implementing NFTs across a whole range of different things,” Burks explained.
The report from the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, published on October 11, urged the government to take action to protect artists and content creators from copyright infringement associated with NFTs. While Burks acknowledges the importance of copyright protections and intellectual property rights, he argues that these concerns are not exclusive to NFTs but are inherent to the broader internet landscape.
"These are problems inherent to the internet, not to NFTs," he said.
Burks drew parallels between NFT-related copyright issues and similar challenges faced by platforms like WordPress, YouTube, and Spotify, pointing out that global tech giants are grappling with these challenges.
NFT marketplaces need to do more to address the scale of copyright infringement on their platforms.
— Culture, Media and Sport Committee (@CommonsCMS) October 11, 2023
We've published our report on "NFTs and the Blockchain: risks to sport and culture".
Find out more: https://t.co/4pYE6gAngw
Read our report: https://t.co/XIj0LYlcrX@cj_dinenagepic.twitter.com/GTbtOJCM8m
He noted that while NFT platforms should prioritize protecting artists and creators, regulators should take a more nuanced view of NFTs’ multifaceted potential. Burks believes NFTs have a broad range of use cases, from managing car records and property records to serving as banking settlement documents or supply chain solutions. To illustrate the versatility of NFTs, Burks emphasized that they are more than just artwork or financial instruments; they effectively function as websites tailored to specific purposes.
According to Burks, pigeonholing NFTs as digital art could hinder their broader utility. He expressed concerns about the committee’s suggestion to implement the EU 17 copyright directive for NFTs, considering it too broad and potentially limiting the technology’s capabilities.
The committee’s report primarily cited the risk to artists’ intellectual property rights arising from the ease and speed of token minting, proposing regulation under the relatively narrow copyright directive: Article 17 of the European Union Directive on Copyright.
Burks cautioned against adopting overly sweeping regulatory frameworks that might not consider the diverse nature of NFTs. He suggested that the U.K. government could learn from Singapore, where regulators assess NFTs based on their specific use cases.
![UK could stifle NFT innovation with overregulation, says Mintable CEO image 152](https://i0.wp.com/nosisnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/image-152.png?resize=817%2C515&ssl=1)
![UK could stifle NFT innovation with overregulation, says Mintable CEO image 152](https://i0.wp.com/nosisnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/image-152.png?resize=817%2C515&ssl=1)
In Singapore, NFTs are examined for their intended purpose, leading to tailored regulatory approaches depending on whether the NFT represents a security, a tangible asset like a car, or potentially illicit items.
Burks’ perspective highlights the importance of nuanced regulation that recognizes the versatility and evolving role of NFTs beyond art and collectibles. As NFTs continue to expand their utility, adapting regulatory approaches accordingly will be essential to foster innovation while addressing legitimate concerns surrounding copyright and intellectual property rights