The financial technology company Ripple, which initially sought to buy Fortress Trust in order to increase its footprint and licenses in the US, has unexpectedly chosen to back out of the deal. On September 28, the CEO of Ripple, Brad Garlinghouse, announced this reversal, igniting discussions among cryptocurrency enthusiasts. This article digs into the specifics of this surprise development, investigating the factors that led to Ripple’s choice and any implications it might have.
The Initial Acquisition Announcement and Backstory
Ripple made headlines on Sept. 8th when it first unveiled its plans to acquire Fortress Trust. The announcement took many, including insiders, by surprise, signaling Ripple’s strategic ambitions in the blockchain and crypto space. The acquisition was not limited to Fortress Trust alone; Ripple also expressed intentions to invest in other entities within the Fortress group, including affiliated firms like FortressPay.
However, the acquisition quickly encountered a setback, which raised questions about its feasibility. Fortress Trust disclosed that the decision to fast-track the acquisition was prompted by a security incident involving a third-party analytics vendor. In an interview with Fortune, Fortress CEO Scott Purcell revealed that the attack resulted in substantial losses, ranging from $12 million to $15 million. The majority of these losses were in Bitcoin, with smaller amounts in USD Coin and Tether. Ripple, being an investor in Fortress since its seed round in 2022, intervened to compensate affected customers and stabilize the situation.
The Fortress team is incredibly talented, and has built products solving real customer problems. While this outcome is different from what was originally planned, we’ll continue to support them and hope to work together in the future!
— Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) September 28, 2023
Despite the security incident, Scott Purcell emphasized that the cancellation of the merger was unrelated to the breach, reassuring that Ripple remained an essential investor in Fortress and a valuable partner.
On Sept. 28, Brad Garlinghouse, Ripple’s CEO, took to X (formerly Twitter) to announce the surprising decision to abandon the Fortress Trust acquisition. He stated, “we’ve since made the decision not to move forward with an outright acquisition.” While the acquisition may be off the table, Ripple clarified that it would retain its status as a shareholder in Fortress Trust’s parent company, Fortress Blockchain Technologies.
Despite the unexpected nature of this reversal, Scott Purcell downplayed its significance, highlighting that Ripple’s ongoing involvement as an investor and partner in Fortress remained intact.
Ripple’s Legal Battle and Implications of the Deal Failure
Ripple’s decision to withdraw from the Fortress Trust deal comes amid its ongoing legal battle with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This legal showdown has garnered substantial attention and has had ripple effects (no pun intended) on the broader crypto industry.
The failure of the acquisition could potentially benefit other companies associated with Fortress. For instance, Swan Bitcoin, in partnership with BitGo, had been working on establishing a Bitcoin-only trust company in the U.S., pending regulatory approval. Fortress Trust played a crucial role in providing custody of records for Swan Bitcoin. With the deal’s collapse, Swan Bitcoin’s business ties with Ripple in the U.S. may no longer be relevant.
In conclusion, Ripple’s decision to abandon the Fortress Trust acquisition, while surprising, is part of the dynamic and evolving landscape of the crypto industry. As Ripple navigates its legal challenges, the repercussions of this decision could ripple through the ecosystem, potentially reshaping the fortunes of other crypto entities connected to Fortress. The crypto community will be closely watching how these developments unfold in the coming months.
ALSO READ
- Ripple Expands US License Portfolio with Fortress Trust Acquisition
- Ripple Lawyer Calls Out SEC for "Hypocritical" Reversal in Case